Photo of author

The Aftermath of the Mid-Season Invitational

An Analysis of the Mid-Season Invitational

In this three-part series, we have reviewed the Mid-Season Invitational to provide an in-depth analysis. You can find part one here, and part two here.

An epic tale unfolded as six top teams from different regions battled it out in a miniature Worlds-style event in the middle of the season.

We witnessed incredible scenarios and captivating storylines, although the quality of play was underwhelming. This raises the question, what makes a great tournament in the esports industry? Is it the gameplay or the stories that unfold during the event?

While storylines are important and can be enjoyed, the ultimate goal of any sport is to outperform the competitors and win the tournament. Displaying superior gameplay is crucial in establishing oneself as one of the best teams in the world.

However, this didn’t happen at the Mid-Season Invitational. There were numerous mechanical errors, strategic mistakes, and poorly executed drafts. The overall gameplay was scrappy, with only Fnatic standing out as a team playing up to their usual standard. Instead of focusing on the negatives, this article will examine the impact of MSI on each participating team and their performance in their respective regions.

Edward Gaming (EDG)

China achieved what seemed impossible by defeating SK Telecom T1. EDG had a mixed tournament as their usual objective-focused gameplay was replaced with a scrappier style. Despite this deviation, EDG demonstrated their adaptability and proved they could successfully vary their approach. Winning the tournament has undoubtedly boosted their confidence, and they now have a chance at becoming the first Chinese world champions.

SK Telecom T1 (SKT)

SKT’s performance at MSI was disappointing, attributed in part to their lack of preparation due to the proximity of the LCK finals and the extended travel time from Korea to Florida. Regardless, they remain one of the strongest teams in the world and are hungry for success. Expect SKT to bounce back strongly in the LCK and prove their dominance once again.

Fnatic (FNC)

Fnatic emerged as the almost-but-not-quite Cinderella story of MSI. Despite the overall poor level of play, Fnatic displayed exceptional skill and came close to defeating powerhouse teams. With an upgraded marksman position, they are now the favorites to win the EU LCS. Riding the wave of positivity from their MSI performance, Fnatic is looking forward to the World Championship, with the prospect of reaching the final.

ahq e-Sports Club (AHQ)

AHQ proved that Taiwan is not a wildcard region. The team showcased impressive mechanical skills and secured victories against strong opponents. Their experience at MSI will undoubtedly improve their performance in the upcoming LMS season, considering the fierce competition in Taiwan.

Team SoloMid (TSM)

TSM’s flaws were evident even before MSI, and their weaknesses were exposed further during the tournament. They struggled with poor early-game strategies and drafts. However, this performance doesn’t diminish TSM’s potential. With the right mindset and determination to address their issues, they can bounce back and win the NA LCS.

Beşiktaş e-Sports Club (BJK)

Contrary to expectations, BJK is in an excellent position heading back to the TCL. They played with a learning mindset against top teams and gained valuable experience. BJK suffered the least from MSI and will likely return to the International Wild Card Invitational in the future.

Mitchell “Zeju” Smith is an OCE analyst and writer. Apologies for the delay between articles, as I passed out during the SKT vs. FNC series and woke up in a fit of rage.

Credit to LoL eSports for the images.

Mid-Season Invitational, esports, tournament, teams, gameplay, performance, China, SK Telecom T1, Fnatic, ahq e-Sports Club, Team SoloMid, Beşiktaş e-Sports Club