The Debate Over CS:GO Weapon Loadout
There has been much discussion about changing the current weapon loadout in CS:GO. People have differing opinions on certain weapons, such as the CZ and AUG. Some suggest giving the CZ its own special slot, while others propose allowing both Terrorists and Counter-Terrorists to choose their loadout from all available guns. As someone who values game balance, I wanted to examine this situation and contribute to the ongoing discussion on improving Counter Strike.
The Impact of Allowing Weapons From the Opposing Side
Allowing one side to choose weapons historically used by the opposing side would completely change the game. For example, if all Terrorists could access the M4A1-S, CTs would have a harder time locating them during attacks. The silenced M4s are not an issue for CTs since they are in a defensive position, but giving Ts access to these weapons would create an overpowered situation. Executing strategies with smoked sites and fully automatic assault rifles would be too strong. This change would also make the standard CT weapon too powerful and unbalance the game further. Counter-Terrorists would have well-defended positions with one-shot kill guns, while the Ts could be easily taken down with headshots. This would ruin the current balance and distinctiveness of each side in the game.
A Case for the CZ-75 and Five-Seven
On the other hand, I believe that the CZ-75 should have its own slot. It is a risky weapon to use, and players should be able to choose when to buy it based on the situation. Swapping the Tec-9 for the Five-Seven on the CT side doesn’t seem problematic, as the Tec-9 generally has better stats. However, the Five-Seven should be changed to have a unique advantage over other pistols, making each gun distinct in its characteristics.
The Community’s Role in Game Balance
These discussions about game balance demonstrate the health of the Counter-Strike community. Players are actively engaged in making the game better and voicing their opinions. While some may have extreme requests, the community’s involvement ensures that the game continues to evolve and improve. However, the loadout dilemma still needs further examination and resolution.