FPS Legend Shroud Weighs in on the Debate: Phantom vs Vandal
In the world of VALORANT, players are constantly debating which assault rifle reigns supreme—the Phantom or the Vandal. Recently, FPS legend shroud voiced his opinion on the matter in a YouTube video.
According to shroud, both rifles have their strengths and weaknesses, but ultimately, he believes the Phantom is the better choice. He mentioned that the Vandal is a powerful attacking weapon for long-range fights, while the Phantom is more effective in close-range defensive situations. Overall, shroud stated that statistically, the Phantom comes out on top.
However, he did acknowledge that if a player is feeling particularly accurate and confident, the Vandal may be a preferable option. But for those who value a bit of leeway, the Phantom offers more room for error.
The Differences Between the Phantom and the Vandal
When it comes to landing headshots, the Vandal is capable of eliminating targets at any range. On the other hand, the Phantom’s damage drops off as the distance from the enemy increases. Additionally, the Vandal has a slower rate of fire and more difficult recoil, requiring players to possess precise aim and aim for the head.
Defenders in VALORANT often hold corners and wait for attackers to make their move. In this scenario, the increased rate of fire and shorter range of the Phantom make it a more viable choice for defenders.
Final Thoughts on the Phantom vs Vandal Debate
In conclusion, according to shroud, the Phantom emerges as the better rifle in VALORANT. While the Vandal has its advantages, the Phantom’s versatility and statistical performance give it the edge.
What are your thoughts on this ongoing debate? Share your opinions in the comments below.
VALORANT, assault rifles, Phantom, Vandal, FPS legend, shroud, attacking weapon, defensive weapon, accuracy, headshots, rate of fire, recoil, defenders, attackers.